Skip to main content
Friday, May 22, 2026 AI-Powered Newsroom — All facts, no faction
PB

Political Bytes

Where the left meets the right in an unbiased dialogue
Policy & Law

Schiff Calls Gabbard's Resignation 'Only Positive Contribution' to US Security

The California Democrat criticized the outgoing DNI for allegedly politicizing intelligence and undermining national security during her tenure.

Adam Schiff — Adam Schiff, Official Portrait, 115th Congress (cropped)
Photo: en:United States House of Representatives Office of Photography (Public domain) via Wikimedia Commons
⚡ The Bottom Line

Gabbard's departure closes a brief but turbulent chapter at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Her resignation comes as the Trump administration continues to experience significant turnover among senior officials. Senate confirmation hearings for her successor will likely draw similar scrutiny from lawmakers who opposed Gabbard's nomination. Any replacement nominee will face q...

Read full analysis ↓

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard submitted her resignation Friday, marking the end of a tenure marked by controversy and partisan clashes over the nation's intelligence apparatus. The departure drew immediate sharp criticism from Senate Democrats who had opposed her nomination, while occurring amid broader turnover in President Trump's Cabinet.

Gabbard served as the nation's top intelligence official for approximately three months. She is the fourth member of Trump's Cabinet to step down during this administration, following former Attorney General Pam Bondi, former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, and former Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer. The resignation also follows the departure of Joe Kent, the administration's top counterterror official, who left in March over disagreements regarding U.S. involvement in Iran.

What the Right Is Saying

The source material does not include direct statements from Republican officials or Trump administration allies responding to Gabbard's resignation. The White House had not issued a public statement as of the time of reporting covered by this article.

Gabbard herself defended her presence at the Fulton County FBI raid, stating that she was there at the direct request of President Trump. She also accused Schiff and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) of using false information to create a media frenzy that led to Trump's first impeachment, assertions that contradict established investigative findings.

Supporters of Gabbard within conservative circles have argued that her tenure represented an effort to reform intelligence agencies that they characterized as biased against the Trump administration. Republican lawmakers who supported her nomination pointed to her military background and foreign policy experience as qualifications for the role.

What the Left Is Saying

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) issued a scathing assessment hours after Gabbard's departure was announced. "While the circumstances around her departure are deserving of our sympathy, let's be clear: Tulsi Gabbard's only positive contribution to our nation's national security is her resignation," Schiff wrote on social media platform X.

Schiff accused Gabbard of multiple transgressions during her tenure at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. "She dismantled critical agencies keeping Americans safe. She weaponized the IC to pursue baseless election fraud claims. And more," he stated in his post.

The California Democrat had been among the most vocal critics of Gabbard's nomination, arguing she lacked the necessary qualifications for the Cabinet-level position during Senate confirmation proceedings. "It's a job that requires judgment. It requires experience. It requires a high degree of trust," Schiff said at her nomination hearing. "Yet, the nominee before us is stunningly lacking in all of these qualities."

Schiff also referenced Gabbard's controversial presence at an FBI raid on election records in Fulton County, Georgia, as well as her claims that Obama administration officials manufactured evidence related to Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. "We must ensure that her tenure — marked by a devotion to the person of the president and not to the security of the country — represents a terrible exception at DNI and not the new normal," Schiff wrote.

What the Numbers Show

Gabbard's resignation marks the fourth Cabinet-level departure from Trump's second administration, representing significant turnover at the highest levels of executive branch leadership in a short period. The departures include attorneys general, homeland security secretaries, and labor secretaries across different administrations under Trump.

The positions affected represent agencies with substantial budgets and workforce sizes: the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Labor, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence collectively employ hundreds of thousands of federal workers and manage portions of the government's approximately $6 trillion annual budget.

Intelligence community critics note that Gabbard's tenure lasted approximately 90 days. The average tenure for Directors of National Intelligence in previous administrations has varied widely, with some serving full terms and others departing sooner amid political pressures.

The Bottom Line

Gabbard's departure closes a brief but turbulent chapter at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Her resignation comes as the Trump administration continues to experience significant turnover among senior officials.

Senate confirmation hearings for her successor will likely draw similar scrutiny from lawmakers who opposed Gabbard's nomination. Any replacement nominee will face questions about their approach to intelligence gathering, relationship with the White House, and positions on ongoing investigations into election security and foreign interference.

The broader pattern of Cabinet instability raises questions about administrative continuity in key national security roles. Experts have noted that frequent turnover in senior leadership positions can affect agency morale, institutional knowledge retention, and relationships with foreign partners who rely on consistent U.S. policy signals.

Sources