Skip to main content
Tuesday, October 27, 2026 AI-Powered Newsroom — All facts, no faction
PB

Political Bytes

Where the left meets the right in an unbiased dialogue
World & Security

DOJ Files Criminal Information Against James Comey Over 2016 National Defense Disclosure Allegations

The two-count filing tolls the statute of limitations in an ongoing investigation, marking the third Trump-era DOJ attempt to prosecute the former FBI Director.

⚡ The Bottom Line

This filing marks a significant procedural step in the long-running legal scrutiny of James Comey, specifically tolling the statute of limitations for allegations related to a 2016 disclosure. The key legal question now rests with Judge McFadden, who must decide whether the government can proceed with a criminal information without a prior grand jury indictment. Observers will be watching for t...

Read full analysis ↓

The Justice Department has filed a two-count criminal information against former FBI Director James Comey, alleging he willfully communicated national defense information to an unauthorized person in connection with an alleged disclosure in 2016. The filing, made in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, states that prosecutors filed the information to toll the statute of limitations while an investigation remains ongoing.

According to the Justice Department, the criminal information charges Comey with communicating national defense information and conspiring with others to unlawfully disclose it. Prosecutors allege that on or about Oct. 5, 2016, Comey knowingly and willfully shared information related to national defense with a person not entitled to receive it. A DOJ spokesperson noted that filing a criminal information to toll the statute of limitations is a recognized practice in federal court, approved by multiple Circuit Courts of Appeals, and stated that the department would not comment further on the ongoing investigation.

What the Right Is Saying

The Justice Department, under the administration of President Donald Trump, asserts that the filing is a procedural necessity to preserve allegations before the statute of limitations expires. The department emphasized that this is an ongoing criminal investigation and that the use of a waiverless criminal information to toll the statute is a standard legal mechanism. This action represents the third attempt by the Trump-era DOJ to prosecute Comey; a previous case accusing him of lying to Congress was dismissed, and a separate case stemming from a social media post remains pending. The filing follows a federal grand jury subpoena issued to a former Comey advisor in the leak investigation.

What the Left Is Saying

James Comey, through an Instagram post, characterized the Department of Justice's action as an "appalling abuse of the Department of Justice." He maintained his innocence, stating, "Nothing's changed with me. I'm still innocent. I'm not afraid of these people. And I still believe in the independent federal judiciary." Comey's legal team has challenged the filing, arguing that prosecutors cannot move forward with the case without first obtaining an indictment from a federal grand jury. His attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the case and to unseal the proceedings, which Judge Trevor McFadden partially granted by unsealing the case but has yet to rule on the dismissal motion.

What the Numbers Show

The criminal information consists of two counts: communicating national defense information and conspiracy to unlawfully disclose it. The alleged disclosure occurred on or about Oct. 5, 2016. Judge Trevor McFadden, who was appointed to the federal bench by President Donald Trump in 2017, held an emergency, closed-door hearing on Oct. 9 regarding Comey's motion to dismiss. The case has now been unsealed. It remains unclear when or if prosecutors will seek a formal indictment from a federal grand jury, a step Comey's legal team insists is required before the case can proceed to trial.

The Bottom Line

This filing marks a significant procedural step in the long-running legal scrutiny of James Comey, specifically tolling the statute of limitations for allegations related to a 2016 disclosure. The key legal question now rests with Judge McFadden, who must decide whether the government can proceed with a criminal information without a prior grand jury indictment. Observers will be watching for the judge's ruling on the motion to dismiss and whether the DOJ escalates the matter by seeking a formal indictment. The outcome will have implications for how federal prosecutors handle time-sensitive national security cases and the procedural boundaries between criminal informations and indictments.

Sources